Keep an Eye on Agile in 2017

starwest

Keeping an eye on the horizon in the testing world is an important part of staying in the game. Hans is no stranger to looking to the future with eyes wide and ears open. His expertise is what makes Hans valuable at the STARWEST Expo, which he recently delivered two talks to.

STARWEST is one of the most respected conferences to date and longest-running conference on software testing and quality assurance. This year’s event week featured over 100 learning and networking opportunities, covering a wide variety of some of the most in-demand topics.

With such a variety of fresh ideas to explore, we decided to catch up with Hans and enquire about what he think are the up and coming topics to pay attention to.

1. How do you think Agile and Devops will develop in 2017?

From what I’m seeing DevOps, in particular CI/CD, is getting more attention these days than Agile. The distributed version tracking system Git continues to change the landscape, and drive good workflows for system development. This includes distributed models, as alternatives or additions to methods like Scrum. Organizations like our own are learning from the open source community how to best produce stable software and control its quality, including in projects where team members are not co-located. Our methods and practices, and our Services organization, are well positioned to effectively support the many variations in workflows we are seeing in the market.

2. How many STARWEST conferences have you managed to attend?

Quite a few. I’m doing Star and some other Techwell conferences since 1998. As far as I can tell I have done 16 STARWEST conferences.

3. Did you notice any trends starting to gain momentum in automation?

Definitely. The field is undergoing major changes. The main ones obviously being Agile and DevOps. This is actually helping the ideas presented in my talks move forward very well.

4. What did you enjoy most about this conference? Why?

Meeting and talking with the delegates, hearing about their challenges and their own ideas and solutions. It is also great to see other speakers again that I have got to know over the years.

5. What is the atmosphere like, and how has it changed/grown from the first one you attended (if at all)?

The atmosphere is great, and has in fact not changed much. It is very open and all about sharing ideas and experiences.

6. What was the best feedback you received about your talk?

I get a lot of feedback during the conference. For me the best response is if people say they will use the ideas from the classes into their own practice, meaning that what was presented really made a difference.

7. What do you think is the most important part people took away from each talk?

For most of my talks that would be the importance of good test design to make automation successful. In my view automation is not as much a technical challenge as it is a test design challenge. This is not a common message, but it is the basis of our Action Based Testing (ABT) method. The idea is to divide tests into modules, and to develop them as a sequence of keyword-driven “actions”.

 

Hans Buwalda

Hans leads LogiGear’s research and development of test automation solutions, and the delivery of advanced test automation consulting and engineering services. He is a pioneer of the keyword approach for software testing organizations, and he assists clients in strategic implementation of the Action Based Testing™ method throughout their testing organizations.

Hans is also the original architect of LogiGear’s TestArchitect™, the modular keyword-driven toolset for software test design, automation and management. Hans is an internationally recognized expert on test automation, test development and testing technology management. He is coauthor of Integrated Test Design and Automation (Addison Wesley, 2001), and speaks frequently at international testing conferences.

Hans holds a Master of Science in Computer Science from Free University, Amsterdam.

Hans Buwalda
Hans Buwalda, CTO of LogiGear, is a pioneer of the Action Based and Soap Opera methodologies of testing and automation, and lead developer of TestArchitect, LogiGear’s keyword-based toolset for software test design, automation and management. He is co-author of Integrated Test Design and Automation, and a frequent speaker at test conferences.

The Related Post

The No-Nonsense Guide for How to Write Smarter and Low Maintenance Test Cases Test design is a phrase that is often used when planning testing and test efforts, but I do not believe it is well understood. Also, opinions vary widely about the importance of test design ranging from irrelevant to the crucial ingredient for ...
Janet Gregory draws from her own experience in helping agile teams address alternative ways to cope with roadblocks including projects without clear documentation, testers with limited domain knowledge and dealing with either black box or white box testing. For testing on projects without clear documentation, is exploratory the only method? I often make “tester errors” ...
In the decade since the Agile Manifesto, the movement has encouraged a number of best practices like test-driven development, user-centered design, iterative development, clean code, refactoring, continuous integration, and—arguably—cloud computing. I’m a card-carrying Agile zealot, and to me its benefits are unarguable. Is your IT organization ready to be Agile, seriously? Score yourself on these ...
Video narrated by MICHAEL HACKETT – Certified ScrumMaster This is Part Three of a Four Part Video on “New Roles for Traditional Testers in Agile Development” Michael shares his thoughts on “A Primer – New Roles for Traditional Testers in Agile”   LogiGear Corporation  LogiGear Corporation LogiGear Corporation provides global solutions for software testing, and ...
LogiGear Magazine – November 2010
Build the right test platform including infrastructure, virtual lab and process. Testing embedded software is both similar and dissimilar to application software testing. The first eye-catching thing is that embedded software is significantly less visible to the end user. User interfaces are limited; there may be a console-based text menu, a simple command line interface, ...
Testing is often looked upon by many as an unmanageable, unpredictable, unorganized practice with little structure. It is common to hear questions or complaints from development including: What are test teams doing? Testing takes too long Testers have negative attitudes
The sprint is almost over; the burn-down chart has not budged. The test team sits around waiting. They hear about all kinds of issues, obstacles and impediments at the daily stand-up but there is no code to test. Closing in on the demo and sprint review… then at Wednesday’s stand up: the heroes arrive and ...
Author Jonathan Rasmusson explains in his latest book how to successfully set-up, execute and deliver Agile projects. Download the excerpt below for “Chapter 7: Estimation The Fine Art of Guessing.” To read his interview in last month’s issue, please click on “Spotlight Interview: Jonathan Rasmusson” to read his views on the best practices for test ...
Writing code that is easy to read and easy to test is difficult to achieve. The fact that poorly written code can function often leads to coding practices that are effective but not necessarily efficient. Too often, many programmers fresh out of school write code in the manner that was effective for passing their courses, but contains ...
Distinguishing these terms from each other can be rather confusing. In an attempt to go back to the basics, Nadine Schaeffer explains in detail the benefits and the necessity of using realistic situations.
Maximize the function of your teams The Modern Agile philosophy created by the folks at Industrial Logic is one of the most exciting ideas I’ve encountered in a while. Moving beyond the pre-canned “You must do X to be Agile” mindset that I’ve seen becoming more and more prevalent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe