Jaideep Khanduja: Progressive Software Testing Approach by Acquiring Soft Skills

In software testing, we need to devise an approach that features a gradual progression from the simplest criteria of testing to more sophisticated criteria. We do this via many planned and structured steps, each of which brings incremental benefits to the project as a whole. By this means, as a tester masters each skill or area of testing, there is always something worthwhile to try next. Important aspects are:

 

Trust

Testing and development teams must build a trusting relationship with each other especially within the process of product development.

Constructive Communication

Initial communication between testing and development teams must be quite open, transparent, constructive and encouraging. This is the phase that determines the course of action for testing, as well as any alternatives. The future of the software, its accuracy, and its subsequent successful implementation, depend on good communication. But don’t make this communication too formal.

Documentation

Ensure that testers have sufficient documents in hand before starting the analysis and testing the product. Appropriate analysis of these documents is very important to remove any ambiguity/confusion/loop-holes in understanding the customer’s requirements. Test cases and scenarios will emerge from these requirements.

Open Mindedness

A tester has to go in with an open mind in all discussions. Only then will they be able to understand developers, the development process and customer requirements. Then they will plan the testing requirements accordingly.

Variables

Keep all important variables in the loop is important to testing and successful product development. Different variables could result in developers working on different modules, documents, testers, etc.

Learn from the Past

Keep learning from past experiences and try not to get caught with mistakes that have been made before. A common saying is – “Never repeat the same mistake twice”. It’s a mistake to test a product in a crude or unstructured manner. Learning from the past is perhaps the most potent means of improving your testing model over time.

Identify Shortfalls in Advance

Be clear about what is in the scope of testing and what is not. Clearly define what is not going to be covered in testing and understand what impact such omissions could potentially have on the product. Foresee any uncertainties or delays. It is important to understand the benefits you will derive well in advance rather than getting no benefits at the end of an exercise.

Keep Interacting

It is important that a tester continuously interact with developers throughout the entire testing process. Ultimately, the goal is to create a better product. To achieve this, both sides must work hand-in-hand to surmount all barriers, conflicts, bugs, faults and defects.

 

Jaideep Khanduja
Jaideep Khanduja has over 20 years of IT experience. Jaideep is currently working in the India Regional Office of a large versatile International group as Head of Quality Assurance and Project Management. Jaideep believes that innovation, team management, time management, skills enhancement, learning, knowledge management and mentoring are the best tools to grow.

 

Hans Buwalda
Hans Buwalda, CTO of LogiGear, is a pioneer of the Action Based and Soap Opera methodologies of testing and automation, and lead developer of TestArchitect, LogiGear’s keyword-based toolset for software test design, automation and management. He is co-author of Integrated Test Design and Automation, and a frequent speaker at test conferences.

The Related Post

Plan your Test Cases with these Seven Simple Steps What is a mind map? A mind map is a diagram used to visually organize information. It can be called a visual thinking tool. A mind map allows complex information to be presented in a simplified visual format. A mind map is created around a single ...
At VISTACON 2011, Harry sat down with LogiGear Sr. VP, Michael Hackett, to discuss various training methodologies. Harry Robinson Harry Robinson is a Principal Software Design Engineer in Test (SDET) for Microsoft’s Bing team, with over twenty years of software development and testing experience at AT&T Bell Labs, HP, Microsoft, and Google, as well as ...
Introduction Software Testing 3.0 is a strategic end-to-end framework for change based upon a strategy to drive testing activities, tool selection, and people development that finally delivers on the promise of Software Testing. For more details on the evolution of Software Testing and Software Testing 3.0 see: The Early Evolution of Software Testing Software Testing ...
The key factors for success when executing your vision.   There is an often cited quote: “…unless an organization sees that its task is to lead change, that organization—whether a business, a university, or a hospital—will not survive. In a period of rapid structural change the only organizations that survive are the ‘change leaders.’” —Peter ...
Training has to be fun. Simple as that. To inspire changed behaviors and adoption of new practices, training has to be interesting, motivating, stimulating and challenging. Training also has to be engaging enough to maintain interest, as trainers today are forced to compete with handheld mobile devices, interruptions from texting, email distractions, and people who think they ...
This article first appeared in BETTER SOFTWARE, May/June 2005. Executives and managers, get your performance testing teams out of the pit and ahead of the pack Introduction As an activity, performance testing is widely misunderstood, particularly by executives and managers. This misunderstanding can cause a variety of difficulties-including outright project failure. This article details the ...
Differences in interpretation of requirements and specifications by programmers and testers is a common source of bugs. For many, perhaps most, development teams the terms requirement and specification are used interchangeably with no detrimental effect. In everyday development conversations the terms are used synonymously, one is as likely to mean the “spec” as the “requirements.”
LogiGear Magazine – February 2014 – Test Methods and Strategies
This article was adapted from a presentation titled “How to Turn Your Testing Team Into a High-Performance Organization” to be presented by Michael Hackett, LogiGear Vice President, Business Strategy and Operations, at the Software Test & Performance Conference 2006 at the Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Massachusetts (November 7 – 9, 2006). Introduction Testing is often looked ...
First, let me ask you a few questions. Are your bugs often rejected? Are your bugs often assigned back to you and discussed back and forth to clarify information? Do your leaders or managers often complain about your bugs?
March Issue 2019: Leading the Charge with Better Test Methods
Karen N. Johnson began as a technical writer in 1985 and later switched to software testing in 1992. She maintains a blog at TestingReflections, a collaborative site where she is featured as a main contributor. In her latest entry, she discusses search testing with different languages. Here is an excerpt from her blog: “I started ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe