Letter From The Editor – December 2019

This is a very special issue of LogiGear Magazine. When we were putting together the Editorial Calendar for this year, we decided that instead of a technology issue, we would focus on the human side of quality and test engineering. We want to focus on individual Test Engineers and their jobs. We talked to a variety of people who work in quality every day, in all sorts of fields. Some of these fields include government, consumer products, security, insurance, education, banking and finance, and more. We also got answers from around the world!

Testing is a multifaceted practice and process-this is one of the things that attracted me to it. It can be complicated, we design and engineer tests, not to forget “the exciting world of” product development.

It’s also quite misunderstood. Some people underestimate the creativity involved in designing tests, designing data, and even sometimes designing an environment and condition to execute those tests and apply that data. Some people also underestimate how repetitive testing is. Run a test. Change one thing. Run another test. Change one thing. Run another test.

The people coming into the field are typically those who do not understand it. It is also mistaken by people who are scheduling it, waiting for it to be done, and the people who manage it. I hope this issue gets people wondering about testing as a career, as well as a glimpse into what testing work is about. We also want to provide people who work with test teams as opposed to in test teams a view into what test teams do, in addition to what they like and do not like about their work. We tried to get as many different situations of test work as possible. Testing is very different from company to company. What passes for normal workday and common practices in one company might never happen in another company whose practices and execution may be completely unique. There are few rules in testing. There are suggestions and some guidelines, but in the end, there are no standard practices–it’s always content-driven.

In my work, I also see how varied the quality world is, from testing being an afterthought that barely happens so the product can meet a schedule, to quality running the entire development and deployment schedule on safety-critical products, and everything in between. I thought it would be a benefit to test teams and the software development world to hear this from the people who work in the software development industry, rather than a simple survey, or just me relaying other people’s experience. So, we decided to have an issue only about testers telling their story, ranging from what they like, what they don’t like, what is frustrating, and simply just what testers actually do day-to-day. 

We hope you enjoy this issue. We had fun talking to so many people working in the field to develop this content. Also–it’s not over! You can join in by now going to our website and reading the other Tester Profiles submitted, as well as post your own!

Michael Hackett
Michael is a co-founder of LogiGear Corporation, and has over two decades of experience in software engineering in banking, securities, healthcare and consumer electronics. Michael is a Certified Scrum Master and has co-authored two books on software testing. Testing Applications on the Web: Test Planning for Mobile and Internet-Based Systems (Wiley, 2nd ed. 2003), and Global Software Test Automation (Happy About Publishing, 2006). He is a founding member of the Board of Advisors at the University of California Berkeley Extension and has taught for the Certificate in Software Quality Engineering and Management at the University of California Santa Cruz Extension. As a member of IEEE, his training courses have brought Silicon Valley testing expertise to over 16 countries. Michael holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University.

The Related Post

“Why do we need to understand a bunch of test methods? I write test cases from user stories or requirements, automate what I can and execute the rest manually, and its fine.” If this is your situation: good for you. If you are time crunched, if your automated tests have lost relevance, are hard to ...
Test automation is a big topic. There are so many different areas to talk about: tool choice, jumpstart, cross platform, services, cloud… Each of these areas have changed so much in the recent past that they could each be worth their own magazine issue.
As we settle into autumn, we’re taking the time to start some new traditions. This is LogiGear magazine’s first issue on SMAC. SMAC—social, mobile, analytics and cloud. We will be doing more issues in the next few years on these topics since so much of the product world is moving to this development stack.
API testing– an old school technology gets way cool again. APIs and testing them is nothing new; the technology has been around for decades. The most basic definition of an API is an exposed function— a producer (person or company) writes a function and exposes it so that others, consumers, can use it. We copy ...
Our plan for the December LogiGear Magazine was to have a forward-looking Trends and Challenges issue. However, whilst assembling our September issue on SMAC, we realized the momentum SMAC was gaining in the industry. We had a large amount of content on our hands from a range of excellent contributors. Thus, we decided to split ...
I led the Editor’s Note in our very first mobile issue with “Everything is mobile”, but it is now way beyond what we thought. Mobile has come to mean only the smart phone, mobility is the word that describes everything a smart phone enables you to do. Mobility is more than a device! Mobility is ...
I have been excited about this issue since I included it in the 2011 editorial calendar. This issue of LogiGear Magazine dives into an exploration of agile automation—from the most efficient methods for test automation, to skill sets and better preparation for test teams, and even to understanding the variety of tools in question. We ...
As part of my work, I spend a lot of time at client’s sites and talk to various software development organizations. I am beginning to see a problem arise regarding Test Automation. There is too much automation! Surprised? While there are still many teams struggling to make progress with Test Automation, many teams have been doing ...
Integrated teams Something we’ve learned in the Covid-19 pandemic is that we have to work together-whatever together means. Very few teams stayed co-located; even teams in the same town worked at home. We’re all working remote. Hopefully all the thinking, tools, work and effort we put into having offshore teams work together benefited us here. ...
We launched the first ever software testing conference in Vietnam, VISTACON. It was a resounding success, with well over 200 participants and 20+ speakers from around the globe; each speaking on a wide range of cutting-edge testing topics. In this month’s magazine, we have uploaded several video recordings of event presentations – giving our readers ...
Every organization goes through times when the internal, or home team, cannot execute the testing project easily or quickly enough. The reasons are many, from the lack of an effective test strategy to low automation engineering skill, to staff positions going unfilled due to a great job market. With everyone working and very few people ...
On the whole, everyone wants to do a great job, have a better work environment, happy clients and customers, and to be employed by a company earning lots of money. All great goals! But this is not always the case. When it is not, you can suggest process improvements, better tool use, different estimating techniques, ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe