The Importance of Volume in Automated Software Testing

All too often, software development organizations look at automating software testing as a means of executing existing test cases faster. Very frequently there is no strategic or methodological underpinning to such an effort. The approach is one of running test cases faster is better, which will help to deliver software faster.

Even in organizations that start to build a test automation effort on a good foundation of strategy, methodology, and supporting tools, taking such a narrow view of the test automation effort misses a huge dynamic.

Simply running existing test cases faster reduces testing time but does not increase testing capacity. Less time is taken to test, a good thing, but software testing may still be falling woefully behind software development and still represent a huge bottleneck. This is further exacerbated by the rapid increases in productivity that software development has undergone and continues to enjoy.

This approach can also lead to another detrimental dynamic. From this approach, often times organizations look to hand the test automation off to inexpensive low-skill organizations that have relatively little experience with testing and test automation – often times offshore. While this can work given the relatively modest goals for automation it creates a future problem. At some point in time the organization is going to come to realize that they need to substantially increase the volume of testing in order to keep pace with development, and they will have entirely the wrong team in place to accomplish this.

More than Automation, the Goal Should be High Volume Automation

To be truly successful in test automation requires a change in emphasis. While it is commendable to do the existing testing faster, the goal must be to do a very high volume of test automation. This will allow software testing to truly keep pace with development. By setting this as a goal, and putting in place the necessary processes, organization, and partners, a software testing organization can keep pace with development and make valuable contributions to software quality.

The Keys to High Volume Testing and Test Automation

What, then, are the keys to success in high-volume test automation? There are many key ingredients, including:

  • An overall software testing strategy that informs methodology and tool selection.
  • A methodology that supports the strategy and makes it easy to design and implement tests. As important, the methodology must also make it easy to maintain automated test cases. An organization does not want to trade the bottleneck of manual testing with a new bottleneck – maintaining test cases. Easy to maintain and reuse test cases are critically important to obtaining high levels of test automation and testing.
  • Software testing tools that support the strategy and methodology and make it easy to design, implement, maintain, and reuse test cases.

Another factor that can be critical to the success of such an effort is engaging the right partner to facilitate the process. Organizations that feel they are weak in the strategy and process department when it comes to software testing should look to a partner who can help them to align quality assurance objectives with business objectives. Such an organization can help to:

  • Define and refine objectives
  • Align objectives and business vision
  • Maximize test efficiencies with the latest methodologies and tools

Companies with a handle on strategy and process may wish to engage a partner who understands how to translate the vision into a high-volume testing program; one with experience implementing high-volume methodologies and the tools that support them. Equally as important is a partner with experience employing global resource strategies to help keep costs down.

Benefits of High Volume Testing

There are many benefits to a testing program that sets goals for very high volumes of developed, maintained, and executed test cases. These include:

  • A software testing organization that can keep up with the pace of development
  • Increased testing coverage
  • Improved software quality (assuming that good test cases are designed and automated)

Conclusion

Successful test automation programs do not simply aim to run existing test cases faster. Truly successful automated software testing programs set much more lofty goals. They set the goal of providing truly high volume testing and test automation. They implement the right strategies, methodologies, and tools to support high volume. Doing so, testing can keep pace with development and make big contributions to software quality.

Rob Pirozzi
Over 20 years of sales, marketing, management, and technology experience in high technology with exposure to industries including financial services, healthcare, higher education, government, and manufacturing; demonstrating a strong track record of success.

The Related Post

An automation framework is a way to organize your code in meaningful manner so that any person who is working with you can understand what each file contains. Automation frameworks differ based on how you organize your code – it can be organized based on your data, so that any person who wants to use ...
From automotive Software Testing standards, testing techniques, and process, this article is an in-depth guide for those looking to transfer their existing skills to this exciting industry. For the Software Car, autonomous driving gets most of the hype, but most overlook the fact that there is so much more to Software Testing for the automotive ...
This article was developed from concepts in the book Global Software Test Automation: A Discussion of Software Testing for Executives, by Hung Q. Nguyen, Michael Hacket and Brent K. Whitlock Introduction The top 5 pitfalls encountered by managers employing software Test Automation are: Uncertainty and lack of control Poor scalability and maintainability Low Test Automation ...
Looking for a solution to test your voice apps across devices and platforms? Whether you’re new or experienced in testing voice apps such as Alexa skill or Google Home actions, this article will give you a holistic view of the challenges of executing software testing for voice-based apps. It also explores some of the basic ...
One of my current responsibilities is to find ways to automate, as much as practical, the ‘testing’ of the user experience (UX) for complex web-based applications. In my view, full test automation of UX is impractical and probably unwise; however, we can use automation to find potential UX problems, or undesirable effects, even in rich, ...
For this interview, we talked to Greg Wester, Senior Member Technical Staff, Craig Jennings, Senior Director, Quality Engineering and Ritu Ganguly, QE Director at Salesforce. Salesforce.com is a cloud-based enterprise software company specializing in software as a service (SaaS). Best known for its Customer Relationship Management (CRM) product, it was ranked number 27 in Fortune’s 100 ...
People who know me and my work probably know my emphasis on good test design for successful test automation. I have written about this in “Key Success Factors for Keyword Driven Testing“. In the Action Based Testing (ABT) method that I have pioneered over the years it is an essential element for success. However, agreeing ...
The Cloud demands that we be as nimble as possible, delivering features and fixes in almost real-time fashion. Both customer and provider rely on software development that can maintain quality while being light on its feet and constantly moving. In addition, Cloud-oriented systems tend to be highly complex and dynamic in structure — more than ...
LogiGear Magazine, December 2015: Test Automation
“Testing Applications on the web” – 2nd EditionAuthors: Hung Q. Nguyen, Bob Johnson, Michael HackettPublisher: Wiley; edition (May 16, 2003) This is good book. If you test web apps, you should buy it!, April 20, 2001By Dr. Cem Kaner – Director of Florida Institute of Technology’s Center for Software Testing Education & Research Book Reviews ...
< Michael Hackett sat down with EA’s Stephen Copp to discuss the world of integrated test platforms.
There are few topics in quality assurance testing that cause as much confusion as smoke testing versus sanity testing. The two names would seem to describe very different practices— and they do! But people still get them confused, since the distinction is somewhat subtle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe