Jaideep Khanduja: Progressive Software Testing Approach by Acquiring Soft Skills

In software testing, we need to devise an approach that features a gradual progression from the simplest criteria of testing to more sophisticated criteria. We do this via many planned and structured steps, each of which brings incremental benefits to the project as a whole. By this means, as a tester masters each skill or area of testing, there is always something worthwhile to try next. Important aspects are:

 

Trust

Testing and development teams must build a trusting relationship with each other especially within the process of product development.

Constructive Communication

Initial communication between testing and development teams must be quite open, transparent, constructive and encouraging. This is the phase that determines the course of action for testing, as well as any alternatives. The future of the software, its accuracy, and its subsequent successful implementation, depend on good communication. But don’t make this communication too formal.

Documentation

Ensure that testers have sufficient documents in hand before starting the analysis and testing the product. Appropriate analysis of these documents is very important to remove any ambiguity/confusion/loop-holes in understanding the customer’s requirements. Test cases and scenarios will emerge from these requirements.

Open Mindedness

A tester has to go in with an open mind in all discussions. Only then will they be able to understand developers, the development process and customer requirements. Then they will plan the testing requirements accordingly.

Variables

Keep all important variables in the loop is important to testing and successful product development. Different variables could result in developers working on different modules, documents, testers, etc.

Learn from the Past

Keep learning from past experiences and try not to get caught with mistakes that have been made before. A common saying is – “Never repeat the same mistake twice”. It’s a mistake to test a product in a crude or unstructured manner. Learning from the past is perhaps the most potent means of improving your testing model over time.

Identify Shortfalls in Advance

Be clear about what is in the scope of testing and what is not. Clearly define what is not going to be covered in testing and understand what impact such omissions could potentially have on the product. Foresee any uncertainties or delays. It is important to understand the benefits you will derive well in advance rather than getting no benefits at the end of an exercise.

Keep Interacting

It is important that a tester continuously interact with developers throughout the entire testing process. Ultimately, the goal is to create a better product. To achieve this, both sides must work hand-in-hand to surmount all barriers, conflicts, bugs, faults and defects.

 

Jaideep Khanduja
Jaideep Khanduja has over 20 years of IT experience. Jaideep is currently working in the India Regional Office of a large versatile International group as Head of Quality Assurance and Project Management. Jaideep believes that innovation, team management, time management, skills enhancement, learning, knowledge management and mentoring are the best tools to grow.

 

Hans Buwalda
Hans Buwalda, CTO of LogiGear, is a pioneer of the Action Based and Soap Opera methodologies of testing and automation, and lead developer of TestArchitect, LogiGear’s keyword-based toolset for software test design, automation and management. He is co-author of Integrated Test Design and Automation, and a frequent speaker at test conferences.

The Related Post

At VISTACON 2011, Jane sat down with LogiGear Sr. VP, Michael Hackett, to discuss complex systems.
Test organizations continue to undergo rapid transformation as demands grow for testing efficiencies. Functional test automation is often seen as a way to increase the overall efficiency of functional and system tests. How can a test organization stage itself for functional test automation before an investment in test automation has even been made? Further, how ...
One of the most dreaded kinds of bugs are the ones caused by fixes of other bugs or by code changes due to feature requests. I like to call these the ‘bonus bugs,’ since they come on top on the bug load you already have to deal with. Bonus bugs are the major rationale for ...
This article was adapted from a presentation titled “How to Optimize Your Web Testing Strategy” to be presented by Hung Q. Nguyen, CEO and founder of LogiGear Corporation, at the Software Test & Performance Conference 2006 at the Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Massachusetts (November 7 – 9, 2006). Click here to jump to more information on ...
This article was originally featured in the July/August 2009 issue of Better Software magazine. Read the entire issue or become a subscriber. People often quote Lord Kelvin: “I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express ...
“Combinatorial testing can detect hard-to-find software faults more efficiently than manual test case selection methods.” Developers of large data-intensive software often notice an interesting—though not surprising—phenomenon: When usage of an application jumps dramatically, components that have operated for months without trouble suddenly develop previously undetected errors. For example, newly added customers may have account records ...
Internet-based per-use service models are turning things upside down in the software development industry, prompting rapid expansion in the development of some products and measurable reduction in others. (Gartner, August 2008) This global transition toward computing “in the Cloud” introduces a whole new level of challenge when it comes to software testing.
Companies generally consider the software they own, whether it is created in-house or acquired, as an asset (something that could appear on the balance sheet). The production of software impacts the profit and loss accounts for the year it is produced: The resources used to produce the software result in costs, and methods, tools, or ...
Let’s look at a few distinctions between the two process improvement practices that make all the difference in their usefulness for making projects and job situations better! An extreme way to look at the goals of these practices is: what makes your work easier (retrospective) versus what did someone else decide is best practice (post-mortem)? ...
This article was developed from concepts in the book Global Software Test Automation: Discussion of Software Testing for Executives. Article Synopsis There are many misconceptions about Software Testing. This article deals with the 5 most common misconceptions about how Software Testing differs from other testing. Five Common Misconceptions Some of the most common misconceptions about ...
Introduction Keyword-driven methodologies like Action Based Testing (ABT) are usually considered to be an Automation technique. They are commonly positioned as an advanced and practical alternative to other techniques like to “record & playback” or “scripting”.
Having developed software for nearly fifteen years, I remember the dark days before testing was all the rage and the large number of bugs that had to be arduously found and fixed manually. The next step was nervously releasing the code without the safety net of a test bed and having no idea if one ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe