Jaideep Khanduja: Progressive Software Testing Approach by Acquiring Soft Skills

In software testing, we need to devise an approach that features a gradual progression from the simplest criteria of testing to more sophisticated criteria. We do this via many planned and structured steps, each of which brings incremental benefits to the project as a whole. By this means, as a tester masters each skill or area of testing, there is always something worthwhile to try next. Important aspects are:

 

Trust

Testing and development teams must build a trusting relationship with each other especially within the process of product development.

Constructive Communication

Initial communication between testing and development teams must be quite open, transparent, constructive and encouraging. This is the phase that determines the course of action for testing, as well as any alternatives. The future of the software, its accuracy, and its subsequent successful implementation, depend on good communication. But don’t make this communication too formal.

Documentation

Ensure that testers have sufficient documents in hand before starting the analysis and testing the product. Appropriate analysis of these documents is very important to remove any ambiguity/confusion/loop-holes in understanding the customer’s requirements. Test cases and scenarios will emerge from these requirements.

Open Mindedness

A tester has to go in with an open mind in all discussions. Only then will they be able to understand developers, the development process and customer requirements. Then they will plan the testing requirements accordingly.

Variables

Keep all important variables in the loop is important to testing and successful product development. Different variables could result in developers working on different modules, documents, testers, etc.

Learn from the Past

Keep learning from past experiences and try not to get caught with mistakes that have been made before. A common saying is – “Never repeat the same mistake twice”. It’s a mistake to test a product in a crude or unstructured manner. Learning from the past is perhaps the most potent means of improving your testing model over time.

Identify Shortfalls in Advance

Be clear about what is in the scope of testing and what is not. Clearly define what is not going to be covered in testing and understand what impact such omissions could potentially have on the product. Foresee any uncertainties or delays. It is important to understand the benefits you will derive well in advance rather than getting no benefits at the end of an exercise.

Keep Interacting

It is important that a tester continuously interact with developers throughout the entire testing process. Ultimately, the goal is to create a better product. To achieve this, both sides must work hand-in-hand to surmount all barriers, conflicts, bugs, faults and defects.

 

Jaideep Khanduja
Jaideep Khanduja has over 20 years of IT experience. Jaideep is currently working in the India Regional Office of a large versatile International group as Head of Quality Assurance and Project Management. Jaideep believes that innovation, team management, time management, skills enhancement, learning, knowledge management and mentoring are the best tools to grow.

 

Hans Buwalda
Hans Buwalda, CTO of LogiGear, is a pioneer of the Action Based and Soap Opera methodologies of testing and automation, and lead developer of TestArchitect, LogiGear’s keyword-based toolset for software test design, automation and management. He is co-author of Integrated Test Design and Automation, and a frequent speaker at test conferences.

The Related Post

David S. Janzen – Associate Professor of Computer Science Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo – homepage LogiGear: How did you get into software testing and what do you find interesting about it? Professor Janzen: The thing I enjoy most about computing is creating something that helps people. Since my first real job ...
They’ve done it again. Gojko Adzic, David Evans and, in this book, Tom Roden, have written another ‘50 Quick Ideas’ book. And this one is equally as good as the previous book on user stories. If not even better.  
LogiGear Magazine – July 2011 – The Test Methods & Strategies Issue
Do testers have to write code? For years, whenever someone asked me if I thought testers had to know how to write code, I’ve responded: “Of course not.” The way I see it, test automation is inherently a programming activity. Anyone tasked with automating tests should know how to program. But not all testers are ...
MARCH 2016_ TEST DESIGN ISSUE
Has this ever happened to you: You’ve been testing for a while, perhaps building off of a branch, only to find out that, after all of this time, there is something big wrong. It’s a bad build and now you have to go backwards, fix something, and get a new build. Basically, you just wasted ...
This article was developed from concepts in the book Global Software Test Automation: Discussion of Software Testing for Executives. Article Synopsis There are many misconceptions about Software Testing. This article deals with the 5 most common misconceptions about how Software Testing differs from other testing. Five Common Misconceptions Some of the most common misconceptions about ...
This article was developed from concepts in the book Global Software Test Automation: Discussion of Software Testing for Executives. Introduction When thinking of the types of Software Testing, many mistakenly equate the mechanism by which the testing is performed with types of Software Testing. The mechanism simply refers to whether you are using Manual or ...
Introduction This 2 article series describes activities that are central to successfully integrating application performance testing into an Agile process. The activities described here specifically target performance specialists who are new to the practice of fully integrating performance testing into an Agile or other iteratively-based process, though many of the concepts and considerations can be ...
“Combinatorial testing can detect hard-to-find software faults more efficiently than manual test case selection methods.” Developers of large data-intensive software often notice an interesting—though not surprising—phenomenon: When usage of an application jumps dramatically, components that have operated for months without trouble suddenly develop previously undetected errors. For example, newly added customers may have account records ...
Last week I went to StarWest as a presenter and as a track chair to introduce speakers. Being a track chair is wonderful because you get to interface more closely with other speakers. Anyway…one of the speakers I introduced was Jon Bach. Jon is a good public speaker, and I was pleasantly surprised that he ...
Introduction Keyword-driven methodologies like Action Based Testing (ABT) are usually considered to be an Automation technique. They are commonly positioned as an advanced and practical alternative to other techniques like to “record & playback” or “scripting”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe